Legal library › Case digests › Labor Law

Case digest · Quitclaims and compromise agreements

Periquet vs. National Labor Relations Commission

She won her illegal dismissal case, settled, signed quitclaims, and later wanted the full award. Could she take it back?

Digest by Atty. Jeric Dave Gallardo · Written from the full text · Published October 23, 2026

QUITCLAIM VALID

G.R. No.
91298
Decided
June 22, 1990
Court
Supreme Court, First Division
Ponente
Cruz, J.
Topic
Validity of quitclaims and compromise agreements
Read the full text on LawPhil

Facts

The case

Corazon Periquet, a toll collector, won an illegal dismissal case.

The compromise

Instead of returning to work, she accepted a ₱14,000 compromise and gave up reinstatement.

Rehired

She was later rehired as a xerox machine operator and signed a second Quitclaim and Release for ₱9,544. She even sent the company’s corporate legal counsel a memo expressing her gratitude for the additional amount.

1989

On March 11, 1989, almost nine years later, she moved to execute the old judgment. The labor arbiter ordered payment of ₱205,207.42, but the NLRC set aside the order.

Issue

Was Periquet bound by her compromise and quitclaim, or could she still collect the full award under the earlier judgment?

Ruling

She was bound. The Court upheld the compromise and the quitclaim and denied her petition.

Not all waivers and quitclaims are invalid as against public policy. A quitclaim entered into voluntarily, with full understanding, for a credible and reasonable consideration, is binding and cannot be disowned simply because of a change of mind. The law steps in only where there is clear proof that the waiver was obtained from an unsuspecting or gullible person, or where the terms are unconscionable on their face. Her motion was also filed beyond the five-year period.

“Not all waivers and quitclaims are invalid as against public policy. If the agreement was voluntarily entered into and represents a reasonable settlement, it is binding on the parties and may not later be disowned simply because of a change of mind.”
Periquet vs. National Labor Relations Commission, G.R. No. 91298, June 22, 1990

Doctrine

“But where it is shown that the person making the waiver did so voluntarily, with full understanding of what he was doing, and the consideration for the quitclaim is credible and reasonable, the transaction must be recognized as a valid and binding undertaking.”

Bar tip

Test a quitclaim on three points: it was signed voluntarily, the worker understood it, and the amount is credible and reasonable. If all three are present, a change of mind is not a ground to set it aside.

Watch it explained

Pumirma Ka Na sa Quitclaim? May Habol Ka Pa Ba?

Watch on YouTube

This digest is general legal information for education, not legal advice, and it is not a substitute for reading the decision. Quoted passages are taken word for word from the full text.